Overviews of Lyons Partnership v Ted Giannoulas Free Essay Example, 3500 words

In Lyons Partnership V. Ted Giannoulas case, the district court ruled that there was no evidence sufficient to sustain a consumer-confusion case. This was reached after it was ruled that the defendant s use of barney-like mascot was a parody. In addition to dismissing the case, the court further awarded attorney s fees to the defendant. As a result, the plaintiff appealed to have both decisions overturned at the Appeals Court. Even though Lyon fiercely contested the decision by the district court, the rule at the Apeals court was no different. The judges reasoned that the use of the Barney-like mascot as purely parody and termed Lyons argument as meritless. Andrew Brown was a professional athlete who had sought the services of one Robert Woolf who happened to be both a sports agent and an attorney. The plaintiff sought punitive damages, compensatory as well as an imposition of a particular trustee fee. Apparently, the defendant had received money on behalf of the athlete but justif ied it to be his for the services offered. In 1983, a district court in Indiana was the first place the parties took the case where it was argued for some time. We will write a custom essay sample on Overviews of Lyons Partnership v Ted Giannoulas or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page This is because there lacked evidence to prove that both parties had agreed on how the agent was to negotiate with other clubs. The court reasoned that there were credibility issues on the part of the agent. Similarly, there was no sufficient proof for a trial concerning misrepresentation.